Actually, I am quite different, I am only too rarely too. “This song is sung by Altrocker Udo Lindenberg in one of his most famous songs, and the title of the best-selling book by the everyday philosopher David Precht is:” Who am I – and if so, how lots? “Everyone talks about authenticity, and everyone wants to have it, but nobody knows exactly what it ‘s all about.” To speak the word correctly is difficult for many people, so many people prefer to use the adjective, and with a transfigured look of “being authentic” “Remain authentic” – but never become “authentic.”
Recognize and develop!
And so we are in the middle of the dilemma. For most people it is true that they regard what is as their true essence, denying the chances of a development of their personality. And what is worse, many people tend to glorify their persistence in the comfort zone as an expression of their authenticity, which must be defended against the uncertainty of a change.
Also our personality is in the flow
If I do this (say or do), I would be no longer authentic. "For example, one often hears this sentence as an advisor or coach when people come to the point where certain changes in their way of thinking or behavior are meaningful. "Authenticity" serves as an excuse for staying in the habit.
What makes our authenticity
Was it above the entrance to the Oracle of Delphi "Know Yourself - and remain as you are"? No! The deeper meaning of the saying "Gnothi seauton" lies in what is not carved above the Tempeleang in marble, but resonates as the message of the gods: "... and evolve to what you can be - a likeness of God."
Authenticity is a self-constructed
This order often means stress for us children. That is why, when changes are occurring, many people skip the so-called "stress and development zone" and land directly in the "panic zone" in order to escape as quickly as possible into their "comfort zone". With the firm conviction: It is better to remain "authentic". "Shoemaker, stay with your bars!"
Guide: Office Easter Eggs since 1995
What is this ominous authenticity? A stained, largely incomprehensible discourse about something that can not be grasped? Guided by philosophers across generations and philosophical schools?
And what does it mean to be "authentic"? Is "authenticity" an everyday concept that allows us to orient ourselves in a complex, social world and to develop our personality in a targeted way?
The everyday life shows: We usually regard a communication partner as believable and trustworthy when it is contrary to our ideas. If he also applies rapport techniques, if he adapts his (body) language to us and our expectations, then we are hopelessly lost. We like to "go to the glue".
Types with corners and edges, however, are quickly suspicious and unpleasant. So it comes to the absurd situation that we feel those as particularly sympathetic and authentic who play their role perfectly against us.
Here, the concept of authenticity and the concept of an authentic behavior as a "relationship compass" do not help us further. Everything is much too subjective and too vague to serve as the basis for safe decisions. Good marriages are just "good", so if they have "their role on it" and "authentically come over."
To the radical Constructivists we owe a way out of this dilemma. According to their findings, our personality is not a cemented state. Rather, our identity has the tendency to change regularly, indeed to renew itself. According to US researchers Jamie O'Boyle and Margaret King, this is about every 20 years.
Guide: The Best Windows Security Tips
The finished, completed individual is thus an illusion. "Panta rhei" - everything flows. And that's just as well. But what about us and our "self-concept"? In this question, does the concept of authenticity help us?
The social psychologists Brian Goldman and Michael Kernis call four criteria that must be fulfilled so that we can be authentic and thoughtful.
The moment of the feeling of authenticity thus begins with ourselves. It is thus a self-construct. It is not about right or wrong, but about fitting or unsuitable - Heinz von Foerster and the radical Constructivists. And in an interplay of trial and error, we continually optimize this self-construction in the course of our lives and develop ourselves.
Thus, in the case of a useful understanding of authenticity, it is always an intrinsic understanding of our changing and adapting as well as dying and newly emerging self. Do not just be, but be! The new paradigm is thus: "I feel, think and act - and so I construct my own."
Is such an understanding of authenticity helpful to us as a self-developer? Yes, because the departure from a statically understood authenticity concept to a dynamic makes us clear the way. Because now the decision is with us and the question
How to design and develop in the future, how do I get
How we are targeted and efficiently working on the development of our "personality" can be found today in many advisors - unless a coach leads us on the right path, for example. All their tips and advice are only useful if we are willing to change. Otherwise, we only use surface cosmetics because we do not develop our own.
No comments:
Post a Comment